Rhetoric of War on Terror and Discursive Hegemony: A Study of Representation of the Maoist Insurgency in Nepal
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Department of English Education
Abstract
This research work exploresthe interpellation between the U. S. discoursesof
“war on terror”and counter insurgencyinNepal.It interrogateshow the discourse of
“terrorism”and“war on terror”flows to Nepal throughmediascapes. For this, I
analyze the news headlines ofThe Rising Nepal, in relation to the U. S. War onterror.
Iscrutinizenewsheadlines,publishedbetween 9/11 and November 26 (onthedate
Maoists were declaredterroristby the government of Nepal), whichsharethe
semioticsof the powerful rhetoric ofwar on terror and also the responsesback.The
research reveals thehegemonizing effect oftherhetoricof war on terror especially in
the Nepali politicianswhoadoptedit toconceptualize and representthe Maoists
insurgency. After exploring the connectionbetween war on terror andthe Maoists
insurgency, it movesontoexposehow the U. S. and Indian attitudehave influenced
Nepali political discourses especially regardingthe label ‘terrorist.’ Toexplore
American attitude, a speech of an American envoy to Nepal has thoroughly been
analyzed,particularlyin referenceto theMaoists conflict.The discourse also helped
India continue its influence in Nepal’s defense system and political directions of the
conflict in Nepal. Thus the discourse helped weakening the sovereign decision
making power of Nepali politicians and made the nation susceptible to international
interference. During the insurgency, the Maoists resisted the label of terrorist on them
through the rhetoric of Marxist-Leninist-Maoistdialectics re-contextualized as
‘prachandapath’ to fit in Nepal. The researchexplores thatthehegemony of the
rhetoricof war on terror discourse in non-Maoist partiescollideswiththeMaoist’s
rhetoric of ‘capturing of the power.’In such collision, a‘state of exception’is created,
in which the country is disposed further to the foreign interference, and each
individual in the state turnsinto the ‘homo sacer/bare life,’losing every right to life.
