Risk and Return Analysis on Common Stock of Commercial Banks of Nepal
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Department of Management
Abstract
Risk and return analysis plays a key role in decision making process. Every investors
wants to avoid risk and maximize return. The relationship between risk and return is
described by investor’s perception about risk and their demand for compensation. No
investor will like to invest in risky assets unless he is assured of adequate compensation
for the assumption of risk. This research analyzes the risk and return on common stock of
Nepalese stock market. This study is based on secondary data of 5 commercial banks for
the period of 2014/15 to 2018/19. Data and information has been collected from annual
report of selected commercial banks. The research design adopted in this study is
descriptive and analytical research design. Expected return, required return, CAPM
model and statistical models like mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variance,
covariance, correlation and beta are calculated and analyzed. The data gathered for this
purpose are presented in tables and graphs.
The descriptive statistics for commercial bank shows that the standard deviation of NIBL,
GIME, NSBI, NIBL and NBBL are 30.79%, 28.97%, 54.22%, 63.66% and 74.37%
respectively. The expected return of NIBL, GIME, NSBI, NIBL and NBBL are 1.96%,
(3.31)%, 0.55%, 7.50% and 16.57% respectively. After the analysis of risk and return of
sample banks, it is concluded that all the commercial banks are very risky with fluctuated
rate of return. Similarly, required rate of return is greater than expected rate of return.
Thus, the stock of sample bank is overpriced. This analysis reveals that the overpriced
stock value will decrease in the future providing the investors lower return and it’s better
to sell these stocks.
Systematic and unsystematic risk has been calculated in which systematic risk is higher.
Systematic risk cannot be diversified where as unsystematic risk can diversified and
minimized through creation of portfolio. Similarly, correlation coefficient between EBL
& NSBI, NSBI & EBBL, GIME & NIBL are 0.93, 0.53 and 0.75 respectively which is less
than 1. This reveals that there is positive correlation i.e.
<1 between sample banks. It
shows that there is no any beneficiary to make the portfolio combination between the
sample banks even if portfolio combination has somehow able to diversify or reduce risk.
