CREDIT RISK AND PROFITABILITY OF NEPALESE MICROFINANCE COMPANIES
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Shanker Dev Campus
Abstract
The major objectives of the study was to examine the effect of credit risk on profitability
of the First Microfinance Laghubitta, Sana Kisan Bikas Laghubitta and RSDC
Laghubitta. The study uses the secondary data to fulfill its objectives. Secondary data
are those data that are collected by someone else or used already and made available to
other in the form of published statistics such as annual reports, periodicals, newspapers,
magazines etc. While evaluating the performance of the sample MFIs and
comprehending the influence of independent variables on dependent variables, namely
Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE), several notable observations
emerge. The analysis reveals a nuanced relationship between independent variables and
the financial performance of the sample MFIs. Non-Performing Loan Ratio (NLPR)
exhibits a positive correlation with ROA, suggesting that higher Non-Performing Loan
Ratios might be linked to increased Return on Assets, indicating a potential trade-off
between risk and return in Credit Risk Management. However, this relationship lacks
significance in predicting Return on Equity. Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) displays a
negative correlation with both ROA and ROE, implying that higher cash reserves may
be associated with diminished profitability. This observation aligns with the concept
that maintaining greater liquidity, while enhancing stability, may come at the cost of
returns. Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) showcases a negative correlation with both
ROA and ROE, implying that higher capital adequacy could be linked to reduced
returns. The statistically significant negative coefficients underscore the notion that
conservative capital structures might negatively affect profitability, highlighting the
delicate balance between risk and capitalization. In the context of Credit Risk
Management, these findings underscore the critical importance of maintaining a
delicate balance between risk and capitalization. While conservative measures such as
higher capital adequacy and increased liquidity contribute to stability, they may
concurrently limit returns.
