Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://elibrary.tucl.edu.np/handle/123456789/720
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKharel, Netra Lal-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-11T05:26:02Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-11T05:26:02Z-
dc.date.issued2010-08-
dc.identifier.urihttp://elibrary.tucl.edu.np/handle/123456789/720-
dc.description.abstractThis research on Salman Rushdie's novel The Satanic Verses (1988) aims at analyzing the novel in the light of the pluralistic, non-totalized and open-ended form of postmodern discourse to make the point that a single discourse about the history, religion and nationality of India is insufficient. Effects of imperialism, the mythologized past of Islam, and interrogation of the unitary discourse of the Indian society are some of the dominant issues in the novel. By bringing various discourses such as historical, political, religious and national, Rushdie privileges a non-totalized, pluralistic, open- ended form of discourse theory asserting that a single discourse about any truth is insufficient. Rushdie develops a postmodern discourse about India in the form of postmodern critique of grand narratives.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCentral Department of Englishen_US
dc.subjectpluralisticen_US
dc.subjectnon-totalizeden_US
dc.subjectEnglish Novelen_US
dc.subjectpostmodern discourseen_US
dc.titleA Critique of Grand Narrative in Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Versesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
local.institute.titleCentral Department of Englishen_US
local.academic.levelMastersen_US
Appears in Collections:English

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
cover.pdf12.8 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
chapter.pdf171.82 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.