Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://elibrary.tucl.edu.np/handle/123456789/7211
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRay, Kaushal Kishor-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-10T05:53:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-10T05:53:42Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.tucl.edu.np/handle/123456789/7211-
dc.description.abstractThis research attempts to compare "supplement" and "contrapuntal reading". These toolsreveal the marginalized andtherebycounter the centre. However, the most significant difference between them is that the former is bound within textual space whereas the later takes any textas a form ofcultural discourseand locates it in context. Besides,the former establishes the playbysubverting hierarchy whereas the perspective ofalterity remains in the later. Application of supplement in Conrad's Heart of Darknessrevealsthatthe theme of "exploration oftheself"andsupplements to the"exploration of the evil" whereas readingofthe same text contrapuntallyshows it as purely colonial though theearliercriticssawitas anti-colonial.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherDepartment of Englishen_US
dc.subjectOrientalismen_US
dc.subjectcontrapuntal Readingen_US
dc.titleA Comparative Study of Supplement and Contrapuntal Readingen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
local.institute.titleCentral Department of Englishen_US
local.academic.levelMastersen_US
Appears in Collections:English

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
COVER.pdf14.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CHAPTER.pdf246.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.