Seismic Performance of Unreinforced Masonry Building with Flexible Floor Diaphragm
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pulchowk Campus
Abstract
Un-reinforced brick masonry has been the popular mode of the construction from
centuries in Nepal. Past earthquake in Nepal had shown evidence of large damages in
URM building. In the mid of the 19th century, during the Rana regime, the big palaces
were constructed by un-reinforced brick masonry with timber floor. These building
were constructed without seismic consideration and for the residence use only. Today,
most of these buildings are used by the different Governmental and non-governmental
offices in their daily use. Since, many of theses buildings are over 100 years and
possess the heritage value. Preservation of these buildings from future earthquake is
very essential for their future use and also preserve to coming generation.
Before analyzing the actual buildings, a fictitious building having a simple plane of 6
m by 3 m is studied in detail, in order to reflect the characteristic of the unreinforced
masonry (URM) structure. The finite element method is adopted for a number of
parametric analyses to determine the response of the fictitious building in terms of
displacement, like:(a) the effect of the wall thickness, (b) the effect of the floor
rigidity (c) the effect of opening (d) the effect of number of stories and, (e) the effect
of the lateral load distribution on different floor condition.
The preliminary conclusions are used for the analysis of the real building, Shital
Niwas, as a case study. Due to the complexity of modeling and analysis of the whole
building, only the North wing of the building is taken for the study. The performance
of the building is investigated in terms of the displacement response. It is found that
the outer wall of the building is collapsed due to the excessive out-of-plane
deformation. The loosely connected timber floor with masonry wall, long and
unsupported URM wall, which extends throughout the height and length of the
building, large sizes of the room which makes the cross wall further apart are main
drawback of the existing form of the building. The conclusion obtained by the
analysis of the North wing of the building can be generalized with the whole building
configuration.