Analyzing the Gaps in Institutional Capacity of Dhulikhel Municipality in Implementing IUDP: A Case Study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHumagain, Sagar
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-13T07:00:39Z
dc.date.available2023-06-13T07:00:39Z
dc.date.issued2022-11
dc.descriptionIn the realm of urban planning in Nepal, there has been paradigm shift in approaches of urban planning; Master Planning in the 1960s, Structure Planning in the 80s, Integrated Action Planning (IAP) in the 90s and lately (from mid 2010s) Integrated Urban Development Planning.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the realm of urban planning in Nepal, there has been paradigm shift in approaches of urban planning; Master Planning in the 1960s, Structure Planning in the 80s, Integrated Action Planning (IAP) in the 90s and lately (from mid 2010s) Integrated Urban Development Planning. Integrated Urban Development Plan (IUDP) is a long-term strategic plan that integrates multisectoral development, sets long term vision, goals and strategies for sectoral development that are driven by the lead development sector of the town. The review of previous planning approaches clearly suggests that previous planning approaches failed mainly because of lack of legal basis for implementation and weak institutional capacity of the planning in implementing the plans. Besides, the implementation aspect of IUDP is affected by the institutional, policy and legal frameworks pertaining to urban development planning in the country. The review of institutional, policy and legal framework for IUDP implementation, suggest that the preparation of IUDP is supported by prevailing international and national policies on urban development, clear roles and responsibilities of the institutions and legal basis for preparation, however the implementation of IUDP is challenging mainly in terms of (i) lack of legal basis for implementation, (ii) challenge in implementing local land use plans and assuring the compliance with upper level land use plans adhering to federal level Land Use Acts and Regulations and (iii) lack of institutional provision for monitoring and evaluation of IUDP. For this particular study, Dhulikhel Municipality was chosen. Six capacity areas were chosen based upon the review of various tools related to measuring institutional capacity of an organization: (i) human resources and organizational management, (ii) Financial and Economic Management, (iii) legal mandates and tools, (iv) planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation, (v) external resources and relations, (vi) political commitment and willingness for implementation.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.tucl.edu.np/handle/20.500.14540/17669
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherI.O.E. Pulchowk Campusen_US
dc.subjecturban development,en_US
dc.subjectlegal frameworken_US
dc.subjectpolicyen_US
dc.titleAnalyzing the Gaps in Institutional Capacity of Dhulikhel Municipality in Implementing IUDP: A Case Studyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
local.academic.levelMastersen_US
local.affiliatedinstitute.titlePulchowk Campusen_US
local.institute.titleInstitute of Engineeringen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
076msurp014 Sagar_Thesis final report.pdf
Size:
1.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Architecture Engineering